Midterm Progress Reports

A Midterm Progress Report (MPR) is a non-binding formative assessment designed to provide students with a clear understanding of their current standing in a course. The primary goal of an MPR is to offer actionable feedback by analyzing assessments of learning outcomes, such as participation, assignments, quizzes, and exams, which are tied to final grades.

Intended outcomes of MPR for key stakeholders:

For Students:

  • Clear insights into their academic performance.
  • Timely guidance on strengths and areas for improvement.
  • Suggestions and resources to enhance performance.

For Faculty:

  • More meaningful assessments to guide student success.
  • Assessment of instructional effectiveness.
  • Improved interventions and support from advisors.

For Advisors:

  • Better identification of students needing help.
  • More efficient resource use for supporting students.
MPR Key Dates Fall 2024

 

Session Reporting opens Reporting closes
Seven Week - First Mon, Sep 30 Sun, Oct 13
Regular Mon, Oct 14

Due: Nov 1, 2024
Sun, Nov 17
Seven Week - Second Mon, Nov 18 Fri, Nov 29

 

Recommendations for a Smooth MPR Experience:

  • Include MPR information in your syllabus:
    Add a section detailing the criteria and process for MPR feedback. Refer to the MPR Syllabus Language Sample.

  • Ensure pre-MPR assessments are in line with your grading schema:
    Incorporate formative and/or summative assessments before the MPR period.

  • Create clear criteria and rubrics:
    Develop specific criteria and rubrics for each MPR category that align with your course’s grading schema. Refer to MPR Rubrics Design Guide.

  • Communicate early and often:
    At the start of the semester and one week before the MPR deadlines, explain the MPR categories and their meanings to students.

Additional Support & Resources

Attend the CTL Workshop on MPR Rubrics Design:

  • 24.09 | 15:00 - 16:00 | MPR Rubrics Design Workshop (Concurrent sessions) SIGN UP here
  • Session 1: For instructors with evaluation criteria predominantly using rubrics.
  • Session 2: For instructors using numerical values for evaluation criteria (tests, quizzes, problem sets).

Request a One-on-One Consultation for tailored advice from the CTL.

Review NYU MPR Website for additional resources and guidelines.